2 ms·
Because I legitimately thought it would be a field where I could maximize how much of my brain I used. Instead, it turned out to be 99% dishwashing. I very muc
by epgui 2y ago
Because I legitimately thought it would be a field where I could maximize how much of my brain I used. Instead, it turned out to be 99% dishwashing.
I very much loved undergraduate studies. I legitimately love studying what has been done and what has been discovered already. While we often say that we know nothing (it's somewhat true), the amount of human knowledge that already exists, especially in the life sciences, is unfathomable. And that's genuinely challenging and exciting.
But as soon as you start actually doing the research work, it's a lot less exciting, not much happens, and there is not a lot of problem solving (at least not in comparison to software). It's just a slow methodical grind, with pretty much no pivoting opportunities. You just stick to the plan, and you must try the same thing over and over again. I was surprised by that. Your experiences may differ depending on where you worked, on your funding obligations, and on your specific research area.
And after you finish your PhD, you might get lucky and get one of these fancy $ 40k post-doctoral fellow salaries. /s
(The way science works at a large scale is pretty fantastic, but how it feels for an individual is a very different thing.)
- resource_waste 2y agoThis just sounds like academia needs drastic reforms. In Engineering we have 22 year olds directing technicians to do that kind of menial work. The fact that the work is so unvaluable yet years were dedicated to it, seems like a failing somewhere. Not everything needs immediate economic value, but to see supposedly smart people not make 6 figures means: >They arent that smart, smart engineers get picked up by irrelevant industries simply for being smart >Someone is directing the smart people poorly. Of course its both, the leadership of academia has failed us. Those who stick with Academia into PhDs and beyond are essentially second class performers who couldn't make it in Industry.
- epgui 2y agoThere are of course a lot of things I would like to change or improve, but I don't know if I share your broad pessimism on academia or research. Science and engineering are very different endeavours, and while both should take lessons from each other, you just can't approach science in the same way that you approach engineering.