5 ms·
It really isn’t. Try make a site with just js and no css and html and let me know how it goes. Then try the opposite.
by manuelmoreale 3y ago
It really isn’t. Try make a site with just js and no css and html and let me know how it goes. Then try the opposite.
- Capricorn2481 3y agoWhy is Javascript being good dependent on not using CSS?
- manuelmoreale 3y agoNot arguing against JS being “good” I’m arguing against being King. King of what?
- Capricorn2481 3y agoThe commenter was obviously not arguing against using HTML? Nobody is arguing that. It's what browsers expect to read to us. It's a vague comment, but then you gave it a metric of "try to make a website without html/css." That's just arbitrary. The original article is arguing against using JS at all. We all understand that both are necessary, it's maximalists like the author that turn it into some war. I could obviously use a lightweight framework to make rendering HTML easier with loops and conditionals, but I'm still using HTML. But JS makes that easy for me and no other language does that. That's why JS is king, it runs everywhere and a little bit of it goes a long way.
- cranberryturkey 3y agoi wouldn't call html and css programming languages
- manuelmoreale 3y agoAgree. And? The comment I replied to didn’t mention programming. I’m a web dev. Take JS away from me and I can still do most of my job. JS can be a great tool. It’s king of nothing.
- cranberryturkey 3y agocool story