4 ms·
https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/how-power-chips-backside https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/how-power-chips-backsid... has some explanation that's a bit
by __s 2y ago
https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/how-power-chips-backside https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/how-power-chips-backsid... has some explanation that's a bit beyond ELI5, but they have 2 pictures:
frontside: https://www.imec-int.com/_next/image?url=%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2022-11%2Fimec%2520-%2520Figure%25201%2520-%2520Frontside%2520power%2520delivery.png&w=1280&q=75 https://www.imec-int.com/_next/image?url=%2Fsites%2Fdefault%...
backside: https://www.imec-int.com/_next/image?url=%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2022-11%2Fimec%2520-%2520Figure%25202%2520-%2520Backside%2520power%2520delivery%2520-%2520concept.png&w=1280&q=75 https://www.imec-int.com/_next/image?url=%2Fsites%2Fdefault%...
Another graphic samsung used: https://www.thelec.net/news/photo/202210/4238_4577_1152.jpg https://www.thelec.net/news/photo/202210/4238_4577_1152.jpg
From https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/samsung-to-introduce-backside-power-delivery-to-2nm-class-production-node-report https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/samsung-to-i...
> Typically, backside power delivery enables thicker, lower-resistance wires, which can deliver more power to enable higher performance and save power. Samsung's paper noted a 9.2% reduction in wiring length, enhancing performance
- barfard 2y agothe pics go to 404
- __s 2y agothanks, I've fixed them btw, you appear to be shadow banned, probably on account of being downvoted for making short comments like "good" or "I don't get it" Short & simple responses may be adequate at times, but usually people will view it as not adding anything Perhaps reviewing guidelines https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html will give an idea of the ideal being yearned for (granted, it's an ideal). In general, trying to enhance the conversation with relevant information/ideas. "your links are 404" was definitely relevant here