3 ms·
Some surveillance may be unavoidable but disproportional surveillance is not. Surveillance in one direction is by design. The agenda and expectation of modern
by WarOnPrivacy 3y ago
Some surveillance may be unavoidable but disproportional surveillance is not. Surveillance in one direction is by design.
The agenda and expectation of modern governments is that the most possible surveillance be deployed outward, toward us - while obfuscating every possible avenue to peer back (and hold them accountable).
Gov officials (especially LEO) never, ever voluntarily submit to being viewed, monitored and examined. That demand is placed exclusively upon us.
This is not ethical.
- hcfman 3y agoAccountability is everything. They talk about accountability but they don't even want that for themselves. Here in the Netherlands, I was caught in the crossfile of unaccountability way against marijuana. My neighbor was arrested, procesecuted and convicted for growing weed in 2005, unknown to me the authorities were using my other neighbor to harrass and spy on him even after he was convicted. Because I complained I was then also targetted for more than 10 years. The authorities told the police not to respond to any of my calls and they trashed all of my police reports, allowing this guy to steal from me, vandalise my property and more. It only stopped when I started protesting at the town hall. Then... after it stopped, they perverted the course of justice all of the way to the courts when a prosecutor who was involved with the stalker together with the other prosecutor he worked with made sure that the stalking case failed (By lying to the judge, withholding evidence etc). Then he retired, but the other prosecutor is now the president of the court of Maastricht and implicated in another case for sending 9 innocent people to jail. https://www.1limburg.nl/boze-families-verstoren-raadsvergadering-sittard-geleen https://www.1limburg.nl/boze-families-verstoren-raadsvergade... https://www.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20180221_00056384/weigering-inzage-politiegegevens-over-burenruzie-onterecht https://www.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20180221_00056384/weigering-... https://www.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20180522_00062344/twintig-uur-taakstraf-na-burenruzie-van-tien-jaar https://www.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20180522_00062344/twintig-uu... https://www.1limburg.nl/leegloop-bij-justitie-zeven-officieren-vertrekken https://www.1limburg.nl/leegloop-bij-justitie-zeven-officier... Here below scandals that the two prosecutors were involved in https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/1039807/liegende-officieren-zaak-joep-j-vrijuit https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/1039807/liegende-officieren-... https://kro-ncrv.nl/programmas/villamoord https://kro-ncrv.nl/programmas/villamoord
- hcfman 3y agoAnd guess what. I tried like hell to sue the government, this is only viable through your legal insurance. They said no chance. No second opinion lawyer said decent chance. The insurer said again I can't make a case, they are allowed to do all this. The government lied and published that this was a neighbor conflict but I've seen police files that show he was involved and letters from the government that prove the involvment. But I still haven't been able to get any journalist to publish my story. Without journalists wanting to publish stories, democracy doesn't have a chance in hell. The chief editor of the New York times came to the Netherlands to do a talk about how journalism was the savior of Democracy. I told her my story, but she ignored it. So much for that then. This country is screwed if a six part documentary can be broadcast showing how 9 people were framed for something they didn't do, a young one committed suicide and they can even publish the name of the responsible prosecutor and still nothing happens and that prosecutor becomes the president of the court of Maastricht. That's how much the government of the Netherlands act with impunity facilitating years long criminal offences against innocent people not involved in any crimes. Viva la democracy de la Netherlands!