3 ms·
<grin> I'm sure he meant that it's all in assembly language for a system that hasn't been published anywhere for many decades. I'll bet that the guys who are
by simonblack 2y ago
<grin>
I'm sure he meant that it's all in assembly language for a system that hasn't been published anywhere for many decades.
I'll bet that the guys who are still working on the Voyagers and have any assembly language knowledge about the systems they use are all over 70.
- Grimeton 2y agohttps://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=introduction-assembler-language https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=introduction-ass...
- simonblack 2y agoWas that the hardware/software used in the Voyagers? That seems too 'heavy' for use in a bare-bones environment like space-craft.
- Grimeton 2y agoThe point is that you can call the language "assembly" or "assembler" and the hairsplitting difference the other person tried to make is nonsense.