3 ms·
Presumably, they would like to know which law firm employs her. That is relevant information, though I suspect she knows better than to cover cases her firm pa
by Natsu 14y ago
Presumably, they would like to know which law firm employs her. That is relevant information, though I suspect she knows better than to cover cases her firm participates in after what happened when the Patent Troll Tracker was outed as a Cisco lawyer.
He was an honest fellow who got hit with a bunch of lawsuits from a troll who didn't like being called a troll and ended up in a mess because he commented on a case he was a party to and ended up resigning. He was outed after a troll put a bounty on his identity, no less.
- nknight 14y agoWhy do you think she's employed by any law firm? She's a former paralegal, not a current paralegal.
- Natsu 14y agoCan you cite a source on that? I wasn't aware of her being retired and I find it hard to believe that someone with her skill would be unemployed.
- nknight 14y agoI guess my only direct source is that every time she's spoken of working as a paralegal, it's been in the past tense. e.g. her H-Online interview: http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Groklaw-The-blog-that-made-a-difference-1243836.html?view=print http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Groklaw-The-blog-that-... It would certainly have been impractical for long stretches of Groklaw's history for PJ to have a day job.
- Natsu 14y agoInteresting, thanks.