>Snark is a signal of cheap argument: They have nothing more serious to say They may well have something more serious to say, and it doesn't imply a weak argum

>Snark is a signal of cheap argument: They have nothing more serious to say They may well have something more serious to say, and it doesn't imply a weak argument in itself. I think it's fair to say the author does have something more serious to say; the question, really, is do you. All you've done is reduced the OP to the same tired discourse, and proclaimed which side you're on, but you know, there really is more to the linked essay than that.