> I suspect the next scientific revolution would be a refutation of Church-Turing I'll give you long odds against. That would be tantamount to discovering a p

> I suspect the next scientific revolution would be a refutation of Church-Turing I'll give you long odds against. That would be tantamount to discovering a physical phenomenon that could not be described mathematically. > a bit like my understanding of the relation between Newtonian mechanics, and General Relativity and Quantum mechanics. Those relationships are well understood: Newton is a low-order approximation of GR in the weak-field limit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Newtonian_expansion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Newtonian_expansion The relationship between Newton and QM is explained, at least operationally if not philosophically, by decoherence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_decoherence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_decoherence