3 ms·
Reciprocity is a thing. I’m sure it won’t be difficult to suggest that certain US businesses operating in China “need to have Chinese owners” too. So I predict
by ein0p 3y ago
Reciprocity is a thing. I’m sure it won’t be difficult to suggest that certain US businesses operating in China “need to have Chinese owners” too. So I predict this will badly backfire.
But on the whole I’m in favor of any and all laws undermining the mind cancer that is “social media”, irrespective of who controls it, worldwide.
- lowbloodsugar 3y agoThey already do that.
- beambot 3y agoThis action is reciprocity. X, YouTube, Facebook, New York Times & hundreds of others are already blocked in China...
- warbaker 3y agoForcing the sale of TikTok _is_ reciprocity. Facebook, Google, etc. are already banned in China. This is the CCP's policies backfiring.
- ein0p 3y agoI mean reciprocity not just on the de-facto government propaganda outlets like US-controlled social media and search engines, but on the more tangible things related to all sorts of manufacturing and access to the vast and still growing Chinese markets.
- insane_dreamer 3y agoThey already do, for the most part, require a JV that is majority owned by Chinese. That has been around for a long time. (This is if you as a foreign business are operating locally and selling to Chinese consumers. If you're just doing your manufacturing in China and exporting abroad, you're in a different category.) Plus, foreign social media are blocked altogether unless they submit to Chinese government censorship. So there's not much that can backfire.
- ein0p 3y ago>> So there's not much that can backfire Why does this sound like “famous last words”?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]