4 ms·
funny how these things are sometimes. technically, couldn't have IBM have hired Mitch when he was still doing vagrant ? and put him in a closet somewhere. Giv
by dzonga 3y ago
funny how these things are sometimes.
technically, couldn't have IBM have hired Mitch when he was still doing vagrant ?
and put him in a closet somewhere. Given how Mitch, cranks out products -- could technically been cheaper than 6.4bn but then again IBM ain't hurting for cash.
- dbalatero 3y ago> technically, couldn't have IBM have hired Mitch when he was still doing vagrant ? That sort of vision/foresight seems fairly rare, I'd think particularly rare at an IBM type place.
- objektif 3y agoIt is extremely rare I would say. Also when you can buy a proven product why risk?
- primax 3y agoSimply put, IBM doesn't have the kind of foresight and restraint to do something like that and not fuck it up