3 ms·
Nobody else is bow allowed to make a public offering of a terraform-using product. That is, you can not provide terraform as a service. Gitlab, Azure DevOps, et
by rahkiin 2y ago
Nobody else is bow allowed to make a public offering of a terraform-using product. That is, you can not provide terraform as a service.
Gitlab, Azure DevOps, etc all have to move to something else as they can not provide terraform builders without a special license.
This was a major blow to the participating open source community. The license bow used is also vague and untested.
- williamDafoe 2y agoAlso you should know that while the terraform language is okay (albeit a little too dogmatic in a functional programming sense for my tastes), the terraform cloud product (runners for terraform executions) is pretty terrible, slow, and overpriced, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory based on the terraform language. This encouraged at least 4 companies to launch terraform-cloud-like products, and rather than compete and provide better service, Hashicorp responded by saying "take it or leave it, internet!" and they closed the open-source license on the interpreter (BUSL)... At my previous company we were driven away from terraform cloud and into the arms of env0 ... when it often takes 10 minutes for an execution to begin and you have no other executions in progress you realize that the terraform cloud SAAS product is just a total joke...
- thedougd 2y agoTotally agree. I had to switch to Scalr. I’m now paying more than I did with Terraform Cloud, but I’m happier and finally have all the features I needed. Those who take this to the next level by offering Enterprise like features such as change window and approval gates from Jira/ServiceNow will land whales.