4 ms·
It looks a good deal like MapleSim (http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim/ http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim/). Hopefully it's less unpleasant to
by ori_b 14y ago
It looks a good deal like MapleSim (http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim/ http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maplesim/). Hopefully it's less unpleasant to use.
- sfrank 14y agoWell, since both are implementations of the Modelica standard I would guess they are pretty much the same, though I do not know MapleSim or your problems with it.
- ori_b 14y agoIt was extremely difficult to model two interacting surfaces -- for example, a wheel rolling on a surface with friction.
- sfrank 14y agoWell, not my area, but a little googling brought up this: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/cellier/MS/andres_ms.pdf http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/cellier/MS/andres_ms.pdf (well, there goes my evening). I don't know, but I find the decomposition quite intuitive.
- rhodin 14y agoMapleSim only implements a subset of the Modelica standard.
- tokipin 14y agoif it's like Mathematica vs MATLAB, then it will be much less unpleasant to use. one of the reasons i like Mathematica is the consistent respect for UI/UX