Okay. My point is someone made an argument about "freedom of speech" on moral grounds and then you cite a legal gotcha "well, legally that doesn't apply to the

Okay. My point is someone made an argument about "freedom of speech" on moral grounds and then you cite a legal gotcha "well, legally that doesn't apply to the whole world". You're right, but the legal gotcha doesn't matter when arguing over morals (or "immorals").