4 ms·
At 24fps that's not even 10 seconds. Calling it extremely long is kinda defensive.
by anvuong 2y ago
At 24fps that's not even 10 seconds. Calling it extremely long is kinda defensive.
- lupusreal 2y ago10 seconds is what, about a dozen cuts in a modern movie? Much longer has people pulling out their phones.
- jsheard 2y ago:( "Our model encounters challenges when processing >200 frame videos" :) "Our model is proven production-ready using real-world footage from Taken 3" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCKhktcbfQM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCKhktcbfQM
- boogieknite 2y agoFreal. To the degree that i compulsively count seconds on shots until a show/movie has a few shots over 9 seconds then they "earn my trust" and i can let it go. Im fine
- bufferoverflow 2y agoThe average shot length in a modern movie is around 2.5 seconds (down from 12 seconds in 1930's). For animations it's around 15 seconds.
- throwup238 2y agoThe textures of objects need to maintain consistency across much larger time frames, especially at 4k where you can see the pores on someone's face in a closeup.
- vasco 2y agoI'm sure if you really want to burn money on compute you can do some smart windowing in the processing and use it on overlapping chunks and do an OK job.
- bookofjoe 2y agoOff topic: the clarity of pores and fine facial hair on Vision Pro when watching on a virtual 120-foot screen is mindblowing.
- mateo1 2y agoHuh, I thought this couldn't be true, but it is. The first time I noticed annoyingly fast cuts was World War Z, for me it was unwatchable with tons of shots around 1 second each.
- jonplackett 2y agoSo sad they didn’t keep to the idea of the book. Anyone who hasn’t read this book you should, it bares no resemblance to the movie aside from the name.
- danudey 2y agoIt's offtopic, but this is very good advice. As near as I can tell, there aren't any real similarities between the book and the movie; they're two separate zombie stories with the same name, and honestly I would recommend them both for wildly different reasons.
- jonplackett 2y agoI didn’t rate the film really, but loved the book. Apparently it is based on / taking style inspiration from real first hand accounts of ww2.
- KineticLensman 2y agoIt’s style is based on the oral history approach used by Studs Terkel to document aspects of WW2 - building a big picture by interleaving lots of individual interviews.
- jonplackett 2y agoMaking the movie or a documentary series like that would have been awesome.
- robertlagrant 2y ago> there aren't any real similarities between the book and the movie; they're two separate zombie stories with the same name Funny - this is also a good description of I Am Legend.
- danudey 2y agoSure, but that represents a lot of fast cuts balanced out by a selection of significantly longer cuts. Also, it's less likely that you'd want to upscale a modern movie, which is more likely to be higher resolution already, as opposed to an older movie which was recorded on older media or encoded in a lower-resolution format.
- kyriakos 2y agoPeople won't be upscaling modern movies though.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- arghwhat 2y agoI believe the relevant data point when considering applicability is the median shot length to give an idea of the length of the majority of shots, not the average. It reminds me of the story about the Air Force making cockpits to fit the elusive average pilot, which in reality fit none of their pilots...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]