3 ms·
> at least some non-US social media That's not the issue, and it's disingenuous to suggest otherwise. It's not the non-US source, it's the governmental contro
by knodi123 2y ago
> at least some non-US social media
That's not the issue, and it's disingenuous to suggest otherwise.
It's not the non-US source, it's the governmental control for specific purposes
> Then what exactly is this bill aiming for?
Not making it illegal to see- just not making it easy for china to do covertly on a broad scale.
- lmm 2y ago> That's not the issue, and it's disingenuous to suggest otherwise. > It's not the non-US source, it's the governmental control for specific purposes Perhaps. Or perhaps it's the US that's being disingenuous, and the real issue is that TikTok threatens what's otherwise a total US dominance of social media. (And note that the national security letter system means that the US has a similar level of governmental control)