4 ms·
I think this is the biggest argument for an OS. The OS is a virtual Nanny or representative of yourself. It does what you would do if you could control the mach
by uticus 2y ago
I think this is the biggest argument for an OS. The OS is a virtual Nanny or representative of yourself. It does what you would do if you could control the machine: provide security for data, keep code from running through fences, and ensure multiple simultaneous routines don't block each other.
- sophacles 2y agoIf you're that concerned about it, go grab a raspberry pi and get cracking on your own compute environment. You don't actually need all the OS stuff as you keep arguing, so go make it so. Of course you're ignoring the fact that linux is open source, so you can go make the OS do what you want it to - that's one path you could take. Or you could just write code for the rpi and build up all that stuff yourself, no problem. The only person stopping you from doing this is yourself.... go do it and show us the "no-os" way.