5 ms·
I understand free is nice and all, and many people are price conscious - but O365 I believe has worldwide geographic pricing, and it is the standard. While Zoh
by rootsudo 2y ago
I understand free is nice and all, and many people are price conscious - but O365 I believe has worldwide geographic pricing, and it is the standard.
While Zoho is nifty, you are holding yourself back quite a bit because you are not running what is the standard.
From what I can recall, and it's been a while - even Google runs O365 because Excel is the standard, and a few other things, but of course not Exchange - though they did have an Exchange Online server a decade ago! (Not saying much it's included in most O365 skus's but I chuckled when I saw it on the DNS a decade ago - not sure about nowadays.)
Meta/Facebook also uses Sharepoint and Excel heavily too.
Around a decade ago I also used Zoho and thought it was clunky but I know enough 2-5people orgs that use it and are happy with it, but I really don't want to spend too much time w/ support and paying for $20 for license/for user, is easy enough. $1200 a month to not have to worry about much is nice enough and for security, geogrpahic blocking and other features it works very well. You can control alot of incoming mail w/ Exchange Online Protection/Defender - so you can cut down on your phishing and such.
I know I must sound like a Microsoft plant, but, for the price, the features included are very generous and you never have to worry about migrating off it for another vendor ecosystem because it is the standard.
Plus training, everyone learns on O365/Office suite. That itself is nice too.