3 ms·

No it wouldn't, see here for example: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/011516/top-5-google-shareholders-goog.asp https://www.investopedia.com/artic

No it wouldn't, see here for example: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/011516/top-5-google-shareholders-goog.asp https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/011516/top-5-g.... All Google employees combined own probably less than 1% of the company. They would need to own at least 50% to accurately call it employee-owned.

Quarrel 3y ago
.. to be too pedantic, but it's only less than 1% if you exclude the founders, who are still employees. (and possibly Sundar?)
- burkaman 3y ago
  You're right, I didn't realize they were still actively involved with the company. Sundar has 0.01% though.