3 ms·
AI is part of the machine learning field. That is to say all AI is machine learning, but not all machine learning is AI. The fine line, as I understand it, is
by dartos 3y ago
AI is part of the machine learning field.
That is to say all AI is machine learning, but not all machine learning is AI. The fine line, as I understand it, is AI must be unsupervised and use weight matrices of some kind.
- furyofantares 3y agoI suppose it's possible that's where the terms are heading, but it's exactly backwards. AI is a very broad and old term; at least historically it even included all search algorithms for example. There is definitely no requirement for either matrices or unsupervised learning.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- jrussino 3y agoTake an "Intro to AI" class at any of the top universities, and you're almost guaranteed to be using this textbook: https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/ https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/ Check out that table of contents. There's more to the field of AI than Machine Learning, even if neural networks are the current hot thing. I think its more accurate to say there's a substantial and growing overlap between the two fields.
- galaxyLogic 3y agoI think we should create lots of examples of mapping natural language statements into predicate calculus, or some similar formal language. Then add lots of symbolic deduction statements, perhaps generate tons of them. Then train a LLM with that. Then AI should be able to handle both symbolic and "neural" reasoning?