3 ms·
The title is more ambiguous than the report's conclusion and follows the "law of headlines": Our results here show that the picture is more complex –when red
by delichon 3y ago
The title is more ambiguous than the report's conclusion and follows the "law of headlines":
Our results here show that the picture is more complex –when reduced to a single estimate, the average (linear) correlation between team diversities and team performances is too small to matter substantively.
Applause for including demographic, job-related and cognitive diversity.
- vasco 3y ago> is too small to matter substantively Seems like a strong enough statement to me no? It is saying there's no substantive effect of diversity on results. That's the same statement as the headline in my reading.
- paulddraper 3y ago> Does diversity make teams work better? > Apparently not! > A new, comprehensive preregistered meta-analysis found that...its relationship with performance was near-zero. Further down you get the number: between two random teams, the more diverse one will be more productive 51% of the time, and less productive 49%.