3 ms·
1. These were anti-Israel Jewish protestors. 2. They “shut down a major thoroughfare.” Seems fine.
by NotYourLawyer 3y ago
1. These were anti-Israel Jewish protestors.
2. They “shut down a major thoroughfare.”
Seems fine.
- koutetsu 3y agoI kind of understand how the 2nd point, "shut down a major thoroughfare.”, would lead to your conclusion, "seems fine", but I fail to understand what the 1st point has anything to do with it. Could you please help me understand? In the article, the protestors are labeled as "anti-war" protestors, and even though the specific war they are protesting involves Israel, I would not necessarily label them as "anti-Israel".
- NotYourLawyer 3y agoSorry, that was a bit steam of consciousness. The first point was just something I thought was interesting and surprising. Didn’t have much to do with my conclusion that locking them up seems fine.
- invalidname 3y agoAnti current Israeli government and specific policies. Not anti-Israel. Big difference that is missed in a lot of the other protests.