3 ms·
Framework's USP is not making simple products, it's making repairable and customisable ones. I don't think there's anything to do there with a TV – there aren't
by danpalmer 3y ago
Framework's USP is not making simple products, it's making repairable and customisable ones. I don't think there's anything to do there with a TV – there aren't bits you want to replace unless you make it a smart TV where you can replace "the smart" or "the TV" in it independently. You could make the I/O modular, but there's also no reason to not just include a ton of I/O on a TV because it's already huge and HDMI sockets are cheap.
The other issue here is that if you remove the crap/apps/smart/etc, you have to charge more, because TVs are typically subsidised by the post-purchase revenue flow that you can get from those features. Most people won't pay more for a TV that lacks features, that's a very niche market of HN commenters, and Framework have been explicit in wanting to move to less niche markets.
- i3oi3 3y agoThat was my first thought also. OTOH, Framework's business model is "we're going to charge you more to get that thing you actually wanted without locking you into stupid business models." I would absolutely pay a premium for a decent TV without all the advertising crap that pops up every time I turn on the TV.
- danpalmer 3y agoI'm not sure that is the business model. Framework laptops are more expensive, but not by much. They compete well with Macs and the high end laptops they are aiming to replace. On the other hand, TVs can be bringing in quite a significant amount of their revenue post-purchase, like $100/year.