>When we say should be, this assumes some kind of intention, no? I don't think so. It's a company, not a person. Meta doesn't have intentions, just incentives.

>When we say should be, this assumes some kind of intention, no? I don't think so. It's a company, not a person. Meta doesn't have intentions, just incentives. And if the incentives of a company are aligned with publishing open science and open software that's as good as it gets. I don't require for profit businesses to do good things because they love world peace or are altruistic. Meta making its money from its consumer facing products that nobody is forced to use and having the models out in the open is exactly how it should be.