3 ms·
A lot of scientific discoveries were stumbled upon by 'accident'. That should tell you that you undervalue randomness.
by spiderfarmer 3y ago
A lot of scientific discoveries were stumbled upon by 'accident'. That should tell you that you undervalue randomness.
- remoquete 3y agoThat's an oversimplification. In most cases, discovery happened because a researcher was there to process the "random" evidence or source of inspiration.
- spiderfarmer 3y agoAnd calling AI a stochastic methodology that noone understands is also an oversimplification. My point is that scientific discovery and the formation of theories is not exclusive to scientists who follow a strict methodology.