11 ms·

One of the people leading ESPHome here. Let me know if there any questions. Last Saturday we announced that ESPHome is now owned by the Open Home Foundation. T

One of the people leading ESPHome here. Let me know if there any questions. Last Saturday we announced that ESPHome is now owned by the Open Home Foundation. The Open Home Foundation fights for privacy, choice, and sustainability for smart homes. And for every person who lives in one. Learn more at https://www.openhomefoundation.org/blog/announcing-the-open-home-foundation/ https://www.openhomefoundation.org/blog/announcing-the-open-...

Gazebra12 2y ago
No questions, only praise. This project is simply awesome, I've been astonished time and time again by the features. I had done a complete dive into the Espressif SDK trying to implement a wireless switch with temperature sensor and mqtt and had nearly finished the project when I stumbled on ESPHome obsoleting all of my work at once. It was just everything I had written so far plus many added features and obsoleted all my work at once.
- rubenbe 2y ago
  I agree, programming is fun, but using ESPHome to quickly have project finished and working reliably is arguably even more satisfying.
- freedomben 2y ago
  I both love and hate when this happens. Discoverability seems like the hardest challenge. I always do quite a bit of searching for existing stuff before rolling my own, and it can be really hard to find stuff. Most of the time I stumble on it serendipitously at some point later.
jtwaleson 2y ago
Thank you! I've rarely been as impressed by how well software works. Flashing, compiling, logging and OTA updates were always a PITA and with ESPHome it's a breeze. Logging over wifi feels like it shouldn't be that simple. I've created a mini IR receiver / transmitter to control my sound system with my TV remote. It was super simple to set up, and the integration with Home Assistant is great!
balloob 2y ago
If there are people reading this and are excited to try out ESPHome: try it out without writing a single line of configuration by installing some of our ready-made projects: https://esphome.io/projects/ https://esphome.io/projects/ It allows you to turn a cheap microcontroller into a voice assistant, bluetooth proxy or media player directly from your browser.
bobby_the_whal 2y ago
Are you not concerned the foundation will ever work against your interests?
- balloob 2y ago
  The foundation can only work in the interest of privacy, choice and sustainability for the smart home. It is important that we have a thriving ecosystem of communities and companies working towards this goal. You cannot do this with just a single player. If, at some hypothetical point in the future, that means it will work against my interests, then the foundation is doing exactly what we created it for.
3abiton 2y ago
I already got my ESP gadgets to tinker, what's missing is the time. It's super fun, and looking so forward for it, but my to-do list cannot give me a break. Great job what you guys are doing!
sslalready 2y ago
ESPHome is awesome. Any chance you can get MQTT running on RP2040W?
mairusu 2y ago
I have one! ESPHome is awesome but I'm trying to steer away from Wifi IoT - a big reason is that I like the idea of self-healing meshes that can work entirely offline, without having to deal with a lot of configuration. Espressif seems to have a few devices with ZigBee capabilities, think there will be a way of building our own ZigBee device in the future?
- andai 2y ago
  Fascinating. When I read your comment my first thought was to use something like LoRa, though perhaps broadcasting your data for miles is an antifeature.
- ianburrell 2y ago
  There is no reason that Wifi devices can't work without internet. Most ESP32 devices don't talk to internet, but to other device on local network. Wifi doesn't really need mesh since has longer range. I hope ESPHome is working on Matter support cause protocol that can switch between Wifi, Bluetooth, and Thread is a big advantage.
- londons_explore 2y ago
  ESP devices have support for sending raw wifi packets, so you can implement your own mesh protocol if you like. They have software support for both wifi and bluetooth meshing as well.
- bdavbdav 2y ago
  This may be worth a read. ESP-WIFI-MESH https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/api-guides/esp-wifi-mesh.html#:~:text=ESP%2DWIFI%2DMESH%20is%20a%20multiple%20hop%20(multi%2D,as%20relays%20for%20other%20nodes https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/....
ahaucnx 2y ago
First of all many thanks for helping to maintain such a great project! The feedback I have right now is that for the ESP32-C3 chip, provisioning over USB (Improv_serial) is not supported. So then the only option is to do provisioning over BLE if you want to get the "Made for ESPHome" certification. However, this blew up our partition size from 1.2 MB to 1.9 MB and basically prevented us to add any further code and we got stuck there (we now develop a native HA integration). So my feedback would be to try and reduce the overhead for the provisioning.
RobotToaster 2y ago
You need to update your homepage, it still says it's owned by Nabu Casa at the bottom of the sidebar :).
blagie 2y ago
The ESPHome project is unusually competent, user-centric, and almost uncanny in how well it works. I'll tell you what I want, though. I'm not sure this is in-scope for ESPHome, or how it's possible to even implement cleanly: I want to be able to make devices which have tight feedback loops and more complex on-board algorithms What I really want is e.g. a light sensor controlling lightbulbs. Here, I want the lightbulbs changing almost continuously by almost imperceptible amounts, things like Kalman filters, and similar, to keep a fixed light level and light temperature based on time-of-day. I'd like to have my air filters, ventilation, heating, humidification, dehumidification, and cooling continuously controlled such that: 1) All run at the right level continuously to keep environmentals and power optimized. 2) Ventilation reduces CO2 / TVOC levels, but increase PM2.5 levels and lets in external temperature 3) Cooling / heating / ventilation impact humidity in complex ways 4) Space heaters cost a lot more than baseline heating, but are sometimes necessary on very cold days 5) This is all less important when I'm not home, and some things change. When I'm home, I want liveable humidity. When I'm not, I want to minimize humidity. ... and so on. (A second thing I want is ESPHome to allow me to make Zigbee, rather than just wifi, devices)
- bobchadwick 2y ago
  I use Home Assistant for doing most of what you're asking for. This integration works great for adjusting light level and temperature: https://github.com/basnijholt/adaptive-lighting https://github.com/basnijholt/adaptive-lighting. My home has an ERV and I use a couple Shelly relays (one for power and the other to boost airflow) integrated into HA to modulate the amount of fresh air I bring in, currently based on indoor/outdoor temperature and humidity. I don't have an air quality sensor, but if I had one I could easily integrate that into my automations.
  - winsome 2y ago
    I would love to hear more about the integration you've setup. I, too, have an ERV but it's on a dumb controller right now. I don't use HA yet, but it's a project I plan to tackle soon. I've also been doing some research on ESP and energy monitoring, so it sounds like what you've done is right up the same alley.
K0balt 2y ago
Nothing but respect and gratitude for ESPhome. I do have a question though, is there a way to use modbus-TCP with ESPhome?
mtrio 2y ago
If my understanding is correct, ESPHome need to be re-compiled and uploaded every time the config yaml is changed. Is it possible to separate the binary and the config so that for some config changes, there is no need to re-compile and upload the binary? Thanks.
- wdfx 2y ago
  I believe this is because the yaml is in fact the instructions for what to include in the binary. It wouldn't be feasible for the firmware to include all possible device and peripheral code and enable parts at run time. I think you can see the esphome intermediate code generation in the file tree during compilation and see how the yaml sections map to blocks of C/C++ code being built.
- alright2565 2y ago
  In practice, this is absolutely no problem. It generally only needs to re-compile a file or two for small changes, which takes seconds, and the OTA update functionality works perfectly so you don't need to unplug it/bring it to your desk.
cyberax 2y ago
It would be great to support more PoE devices and Ethernet-based provisioning. And also alternative wired buses, such as BACNET or a generic RS-485. The other axis: Zigbee devices and battery power. ESPs can be used with batteries, but right now it's not a great fit. And the last feature: better reuse support for custom devices. E.g. if I have 20 similar custom devices.
- epcoa 2y ago
  > generic RS-485 You can already hook up an RS-485 transceiver to the UART ports and use it today with the UART driver. Esphome also has a Modbus controller component. What are you referring to by “generic” RS-485 that isn’t available already?
  - cyberax 2y ago
    RS-485 is a shared bus, so you need to use some kind of a protocol to arbitrate access, and to make sure you don't flash unintended devices. BACnet is one example, but other protocols can work too.
    - epcoa 2y ago
      https://esphome.io/components/modbus_controller.html https://esphome.io/components/modbus_controller.html
      - cyberax 2y ago
        It doesn't allow firmware updates over modbus. The same would also apply to Zigbee.
    - deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
- wkat4242 2y ago
  Yes the modules with rpi2040 and Ethernet would be so great to have supported. I'm pretty unhappy with the WiFi 8266 modules I have. They regularly go into unavailable in home assistant for a few minutes even though my WiFi is working fine
WhyNotHugo 2y ago
I want to connect a temperature sensor to an esp, and trigger a radiator valve based in temperature range. Valves are mostly zigbee. Can I somehow control one with ESPHome without Home Assistant or zigbee2mqtt? I want to understand if I can avoid adding a full blown Linux server into the equation.
- Doe-_ 2y ago
  You can bind a device to another, so while you would need the ability to issue the command, a server wouldn't be required to handle the state propagation. https://smarthomescene.com/guides/how-to-bind-zigbee-devices-directly-in-zigbee2mqtt/ https://smarthomescene.com/guides/how-to-bind-zigbee-devices...
- jbensan 2y ago
  "mostly zigbee?" not sure what you mean there. But ESPHome can be controlled directly without HA. You should read the website, specifically the sections on "Networking" and "Management and Monitoring". If you are starting at zero there is a big learning curve, but if you're into it, it is a lot of fun.
- Larrikin 2y ago
  Why do you want to avoid Home Assistant? From what I've found setting up my automations is that once you have it doing something useful you find you have a lot of ideas to further make your life better. I might be wrong but I suspect you'll spend a lot of time doing something that is simple in HA only then find you want to do something else similar.
asdefghyk 2y ago
Question: On a typical ESPHome device, reporting temperature (say every 15 minutes) via wireless to HomeAssistant, what battery life is possible ?
- pcollins123 2y ago
  With a $10 18650 rechargeable battery you could probably get a couple months on a single charge. Esphome can deep sleep between readouts: https://esphome.io/components/deep_sleep.html https://esphome.io/components/deep_sleep.html Deep sleep pulls the power draw down to 50uA. Of course if you also wire a solar charger next to the battery… maybe it will never run out.
JoBrad 2y ago
I’ve been using Home Assistant for about 3 years now, and talk about it to pretty much anyone who will listen. Thanks for keeping home automation open and focused on the users!

Gazebra12 2y ago

No questions, only praise. This project is simply awesome, I've been astonished time and time again by the features. I had done a complete dive into the Espressif SDK trying to implement a wireless switch with temperature sensor and mqtt and had nearly finished the project when I stumbled on ESPHome obsoleting all of my work at once. It was just everything I had written so far plus many added features and obsoleted all my work at once.

rubenbe 2y ago
I agree, programming is fun, but using ESPHome to quickly have project finished and working reliably is arguably even more satisfying.
freedomben 2y ago
I both love and hate when this happens. Discoverability seems like the hardest challenge. I always do quite a bit of searching for existing stuff before rolling my own, and it can be really hard to find stuff. Most of the time I stumble on it serendipitously at some point later.

jtwaleson 2y ago

Thank you! I've rarely been as impressed by how well software works. Flashing, compiling, logging and OTA updates were always a PITA and with ESPHome it's a breeze. Logging over wifi feels like it shouldn't be that simple. I've created a mini IR receiver / transmitter to control my sound system with my TV remote. It was super simple to set up, and the integration with Home Assistant is great!

balloob 2y ago

If there are people reading this and are excited to try out ESPHome: try it out without writing a single line of configuration by installing some of our ready-made projects: https://esphome.io/projects/ https://esphome.io/projects/ It allows you to turn a cheap microcontroller into a voice assistant, bluetooth proxy or media player directly from your browser.

bobby_the_whal 2y ago

Are you not concerned the foundation will ever work against your interests?

balloob 2y ago
The foundation can only work in the interest of privacy, choice and sustainability for the smart home. It is important that we have a thriving ecosystem of communities and companies working towards this goal. You cannot do this with just a single player. If, at some hypothetical point in the future, that means it will work against my interests, then the foundation is doing exactly what we created it for.

3abiton 2y ago

I already got my ESP gadgets to tinker, what's missing is the time. It's super fun, and looking so forward for it, but my to-do list cannot give me a break. Great job what you guys are doing!

sslalready 2y ago

ESPHome is awesome. Any chance you can get MQTT running on RP2040W?

mairusu 2y ago

I have one! ESPHome is awesome but I'm trying to steer away from Wifi IoT - a big reason is that I like the idea of self-healing meshes that can work entirely offline, without having to deal with a lot of configuration. Espressif seems to have a few devices with ZigBee capabilities, think there will be a way of building our own ZigBee device in the future?

andai 2y ago
Fascinating. When I read your comment my first thought was to use something like LoRa, though perhaps broadcasting your data for miles is an antifeature.
ianburrell 2y ago
There is no reason that Wifi devices can't work without internet. Most ESP32 devices don't talk to internet, but to other device on local network. Wifi doesn't really need mesh since has longer range. I hope ESPHome is working on Matter support cause protocol that can switch between Wifi, Bluetooth, and Thread is a big advantage.
londons_explore 2y ago
ESP devices have support for sending raw wifi packets, so you can implement your own mesh protocol if you like. They have software support for both wifi and bluetooth meshing as well.
bdavbdav 2y ago
This may be worth a read. ESP-WIFI-MESH https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/api-guides/esp-wifi-mesh.html#:~:text=ESP%2DWIFI%2DMESH%20is%20a%20multiple%20hop%20(multi%2D,as%20relays%20for%20other%20nodes https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32/....

ahaucnx 2y ago

First of all many thanks for helping to maintain such a great project! The feedback I have right now is that for the ESP32-C3 chip, provisioning over USB (Improv_serial) is not supported. So then the only option is to do provisioning over BLE if you want to get the "Made for ESPHome" certification. However, this blew up our partition size from 1.2 MB to 1.9 MB and basically prevented us to add any further code and we got stuck there (we now develop a native HA integration). So my feedback would be to try and reduce the overhead for the provisioning.

RobotToaster 2y ago

You need to update your homepage, it still says it's owned by Nabu Casa at the bottom of the sidebar :).

blagie 2y ago

The ESPHome project is unusually competent, user-centric, and almost uncanny in how well it works. I'll tell you what I want, though. I'm not sure this is in-scope for ESPHome, or how it's possible to even implement cleanly: I want to be able to make devices which have tight feedback loops and more complex on-board algorithms What I really want is e.g. a light sensor controlling lightbulbs. Here, I want the lightbulbs changing almost continuously by almost imperceptible amounts, things like Kalman filters, and similar, to keep a fixed light level and light temperature based on time-of-day. I'd like to have my air filters, ventilation, heating, humidification, dehumidification, and cooling continuously controlled such that: 1) All run at the right level continuously to keep environmentals and power optimized. 2) Ventilation reduces CO2 / TVOC levels, but increase PM2.5 levels and lets in external temperature 3) Cooling / heating / ventilation impact humidity in complex ways 4) Space heaters cost a lot more than baseline heating, but are sometimes necessary on very cold days 5) This is all less important when I'm not home, and some things change. When I'm home, I want liveable humidity. When I'm not, I want to minimize humidity. ... and so on. (A second thing I want is ESPHome to allow me to make Zigbee, rather than just wifi, devices)

bobchadwick 2y ago
I use Home Assistant for doing most of what you're asking for. This integration works great for adjusting light level and temperature: https://github.com/basnijholt/adaptive-lighting https://github.com/basnijholt/adaptive-lighting. My home has an ERV and I use a couple Shelly relays (one for power and the other to boost airflow) integrated into HA to modulate the amount of fresh air I bring in, currently based on indoor/outdoor temperature and humidity. I don't have an air quality sensor, but if I had one I could easily integrate that into my automations.
- winsome 2y ago
  I would love to hear more about the integration you've setup. I, too, have an ERV but it's on a dumb controller right now. I don't use HA yet, but it's a project I plan to tackle soon. I've also been doing some research on ESP and energy monitoring, so it sounds like what you've done is right up the same alley.

K0balt 2y ago

Nothing but respect and gratitude for ESPhome. I do have a question though, is there a way to use modbus-TCP with ESPhome?

mtrio 2y ago

If my understanding is correct, ESPHome need to be re-compiled and uploaded every time the config yaml is changed. Is it possible to separate the binary and the config so that for some config changes, there is no need to re-compile and upload the binary? Thanks.

wdfx 2y ago
I believe this is because the yaml is in fact the instructions for what to include in the binary. It wouldn't be feasible for the firmware to include all possible device and peripheral code and enable parts at run time. I think you can see the esphome intermediate code generation in the file tree during compilation and see how the yaml sections map to blocks of C/C++ code being built.
alright2565 2y ago
In practice, this is absolutely no problem. It generally only needs to re-compile a file or two for small changes, which takes seconds, and the OTA update functionality works perfectly so you don't need to unplug it/bring it to your desk.

cyberax 2y ago

It would be great to support more PoE devices and Ethernet-based provisioning. And also alternative wired buses, such as BACNET or a generic RS-485. The other axis: Zigbee devices and battery power. ESPs can be used with batteries, but right now it's not a great fit. And the last feature: better reuse support for custom devices. E.g. if I have 20 similar custom devices.

epcoa 2y ago
> generic RS-485 You can already hook up an RS-485 transceiver to the UART ports and use it today with the UART driver. Esphome also has a Modbus controller component. What are you referring to by “generic” RS-485 that isn’t available already?
- cyberax 2y ago
  RS-485 is a shared bus, so you need to use some kind of a protocol to arbitrate access, and to make sure you don't flash unintended devices. BACnet is one example, but other protocols can work too.
  - epcoa 2y ago
    https://esphome.io/components/modbus_controller.html https://esphome.io/components/modbus_controller.html
    - cyberax 2y ago
      It doesn't allow firmware updates over modbus. The same would also apply to Zigbee.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
wkat4242 2y ago
Yes the modules with rpi2040 and Ethernet would be so great to have supported. I'm pretty unhappy with the WiFi 8266 modules I have. They regularly go into unavailable in home assistant for a few minutes even though my WiFi is working fine

WhyNotHugo 2y ago

I want to connect a temperature sensor to an esp, and trigger a radiator valve based in temperature range. Valves are mostly zigbee. Can I somehow control one with ESPHome without Home Assistant or zigbee2mqtt? I want to understand if I can avoid adding a full blown Linux server into the equation.

Doe-_ 2y ago
You can bind a device to another, so while you would need the ability to issue the command, a server wouldn't be required to handle the state propagation. https://smarthomescene.com/guides/how-to-bind-zigbee-devices-directly-in-zigbee2mqtt/ https://smarthomescene.com/guides/how-to-bind-zigbee-devices...
jbensan 2y ago
"mostly zigbee?" not sure what you mean there. But ESPHome can be controlled directly without HA. You should read the website, specifically the sections on "Networking" and "Management and Monitoring". If you are starting at zero there is a big learning curve, but if you're into it, it is a lot of fun.
Larrikin 2y ago
Why do you want to avoid Home Assistant? From what I've found setting up my automations is that once you have it doing something useful you find you have a lot of ideas to further make your life better. I might be wrong but I suspect you'll spend a lot of time doing something that is simple in HA only then find you want to do something else similar.

asdefghyk 2y ago

Question: On a typical ESPHome device, reporting temperature (say every 15 minutes) via wireless to HomeAssistant, what battery life is possible ?

pcollins123 2y ago
With a $10 18650 rechargeable battery you could probably get a couple months on a single charge. Esphome can deep sleep between readouts: https://esphome.io/components/deep_sleep.html https://esphome.io/components/deep_sleep.html Deep sleep pulls the power draw down to 50uA. Of course if you also wire a solar charger next to the battery… maybe it will never run out.

JoBrad 2y ago

I’ve been using Home Assistant for about 3 years now, and talk about it to pretty much anyone who will listen. Thanks for keeping home automation open and focused on the users!