You didn't read me. I'm against giving human rights to AI, because they don't suffer or have human needs. I didn't claim materialism, or that everything is a r

You didn't read me. I'm against giving human rights to AI, because they don't suffer or have human needs. I didn't claim materialism, or that everything is a robot. I didn't claim AI is the greatest of machines. What I claimed is that 1. some humans call themselves robots 2. those humans tend to depend on technology in a profound way 3. we should give those humans access to the technologies they need to have quality of life Again I'm not arguing that AI is the greatest of all machines or that all things are machines. I'm arguing that technologically dependent humans deserve access to technology and quality of life. For an example of a right that you probably agree with: all people should have the right to a good internet connection, since we all depend on it for quality of life.