3 ms·
I still wonder why they don't do ATDD. Even when you use a statically typed language there is plenty of room for failure. I recommend using: - vagrant http
by rmoriz 14y ago
I still wonder why they don't do ATDD.
Even when you use a statically typed language there is plenty of room for failure.
I recommend using:
- vagrant http://vagrantup.com/ http://vagrantup.com/
- toft https://github.com/exceedhl/toft/ https://github.com/exceedhl/toft/
- cucumber http://cukes.info/ http://cukes.info/
- aruba https://github.com/cucumber/aruba https://github.com/cucumber/aruba
to write/reverse engineer examples/user stories.
- raverbashing 14y agoNo Enough with the nonsense. TDD is great for some tools, in some situations. It's not a "solve all". And now comes "ATDD", people should start working instead on inventing acronyms. vagrant? really, REALLY? Try QEMU. Try chroot News flash, sudo is not a RoR application. Especially sudo with all the magic that goes behind executing a process as another user.
- rmoriz 14y ago"Especially sudo with all the magic that goes behind executing a process as another user." Your last sentence kills your standpoint totally. Please check out the mentioned "toft". It's lxc inside vagrant and designed to test complex infrastructure code from the outside in. Nothing web related.
- dredmorbius 14y agoAcronym expansion: ATDD - acceptance test driven development.