2 ms·
So does he think large, private, for-profit companies should be in charge of nuclear weapons as well?
by cassianoleal 3y ago
So does he think large, private, for-profit companies should be in charge of nuclear weapons as well?
- kian 3y agoperhaps he's suggesting that they seize the software, weights, and training data from every company who's engaged in this? Or maybe he's just trying to protect profits and doesn't mean a word of it...
- kevindamm 3y agoLarge, private, for-profit companies were in charge of Uranium mining and refinement.
- cassianoleal 3y agoSure but not the operation of the bombs.
- kevindamm 3y agoI think in this analogy that's the people using LLMs, right? I'm not proposing more regulation of AI but pointing out that a comparison to nuclear warheads is not so cut and dry.
- cassianoleal 3y agoThe OP made that comparison. My comment had the intention of illustrating how bad an analogy that was. Maybe I missed the mark! :)
- janice1999 3y agoAnd they are heavily regulated. It's not like they can do whatever they want or sell to who ever they wanted.