2 ms·
That's what the article is arguing though. That a certain individual is 'killing' (not killed yet) Google Search. A different title would be misleading.
by guardiangod 2y ago
That's what the article is arguing though. That a certain individual is 'killing' (not killed yet) Google Search. A different title would be misleading.
- dang 2y agoSince killing != killed, your comment already shows that the title is misleading.
- abtinf 2y agoThe article is not arguing that the killing is still on going, but that google has already been killed. "Google" in the title should be read as "culture" or "the heart and soul of Google", not "Google the company". Possible better title: "The man who destroyed the soul of Google Search"