3 ms·

What's the source for all of this? It includes reportage of a bunch of conversations where there's no way this guy was present.

frereubu 3y ago
There are plenty of links in the article to "emails released as part of the Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Google". I didn't read any of it as saying he was involved in those conversations, they're just conversations that have been made public.
edzitron 3y ago
I am directly citing emails revealed in discovery as part of the Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Google. They're all linked in there too! And you can even see who was CC'd. It's a little confusing because some of them are part of one big, fat thread that you have to read from the bottom up.
- seanhunter 3y ago
  Thanks for responding. That'll teach me to skim-read while I'm on a meeting so can't give it my full attention.
  - edzitron 3y ago
    No worries at all, happens to the best of us!
- DaiPlusPlus 3y ago
  > It's a little confusing because some of them are part of one big, fat thread that you have to read from the bottom up It seems no-one, not even Google, can escape Outlook-style email concatenation.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
Jtsummers 3y ago
The article has a bunch of links like this one: https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl If you follow them you'll get copies of email threads related to a suit against Google where the non-public information was revealed.
neuronexmachina 3y ago
It's based on emails published as evidence in a trial: * https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl?inline= https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl?inl... * https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417557.pdf https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417557.pdf * https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417581.pdf https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417581.pdf

frereubu 3y ago

There are plenty of links in the article to "emails released as part of the Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Google". I didn't read any of it as saying he was involved in those conversations, they're just conversations that have been made public.

edzitron 3y ago

I am directly citing emails revealed in discovery as part of the Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Google. They're all linked in there too! And you can even see who was CC'd. It's a little confusing because some of them are part of one big, fat thread that you have to read from the bottom up.

seanhunter 3y ago
Thanks for responding. That'll teach me to skim-read while I'm on a meeting so can't give it my full attention.
- edzitron 3y ago
  No worries at all, happens to the best of us!
DaiPlusPlus 3y ago
> It's a little confusing because some of them are part of one big, fat thread that you have to read from the bottom up It seems no-one, not even Google, can escape Outlook-style email concatenation.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

Jtsummers 3y ago

The article has a bunch of links like this one: https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl If you follow them you'll get copies of email threads related to a suit against Google where the non-public information was revealed.

neuronexmachina 3y ago

It's based on emails published as evidence in a trial: * https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl?inline= https://www.justice.gov/usdoj-media/atr/media/1322631/dl?inl... * https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417557.pdf https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417557.pdf * https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417581.pdf https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417581.pdf