3 ms·

I must once again point you back to the article.

• JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > must once again point you back to the article Where in it does it absolve those fired who weren’t physically on premises of otherwise being involved?
  • KenArrari 2y ago
    They said they weren't involved. But they were involved in protesting. Does standing in front of a doorway require a comlpicated planning initiative? There is absolutely nothing they could have done other than speak about it. Which is all they're being accused of anyway.