3 ms·
I like that "the heating of Earth's atmosphere by a hail of falling lunar debris would be destructive to all life" is only the second of three cited reasons for
by aaronharnly 2y ago
I like that "the heating of Earth's atmosphere by a hail of falling lunar debris would be destructive to all life" is only the second of three cited reasons for the proposal's rejection.
- saalweachter 2y agoI think structurally it should have been third. As it's currently structured there are three objections. 1. We couldn't do it. 2. It would have disastrous side effects. 3. It wouldn't fix the problem you're trying to solve, and it would in fact make it worse. Objections 2&3 should be swapped, "all life on Earth would be vaporized" should really be issue #3.