4 ms·
I would, and once I get my shirt I would wear it or not, depending on what's in the back, my advise to you would be to allow people ordering the shirts to pick
by heelhook 14y ago
I would, and once I get my shirt I would wear it or not, depending on what's in the back, my advise to you would be to allow people ordering the shirts to pick what company or design they'll have in the back, I might have a problem wearing merchandise of companies that don't sit well with my lifestyle (e.g. as a vegetarian, I wouldn't wear the shirt of a company that primarily sells meat, like McDonald's).
Offering the people that are wearing the shirts a mix of back designs (say, three different ad designs to pick from for Whole Foods or any other advertiser) would be a plus to improve adoption.
- gghootch 14y ago3 different advertisers requires mass customization => extra overhead. You'll get to choose advertiser + t-shirt combos; not sure if added flexibility will make up for the increase in price, but I'll keep it in mind!
- heelhook 14y agoAs an advertiser, I would definitely like to be able to be allowed to A/B different designs for the ads, it sounds pretty simple for an advertiser to be able to provide a few different designs and let people choose from them, or are you referring to a different cost?
- mbell 14y agoI agree. At the very least I'd have to be able to opt out of market segments, e.g. no fast food (McDonalds), sexual aids (viagra), political/religious groups, etc.