3 ms·
Yes, and that needs to stop. An off-grid setup should still be subject to all the applicable building and electrical codes, inspections, etc., and perhaps extr
by toss1 3y ago
Yes, and that needs to stop. An off-grid setup should still be subject to all the applicable building and electrical codes, inspections, etc., and perhaps extra checkups on battery health. But once it is installed, running, and inspected, it should be like any other household.
I'm personally flabbergasted that a basic solar installation (e.g., 2 kw+) hasn't been required on every house for national defense, just as the impetus for the interstate highway system national defense (and obviously now maintained for the commerce it enables). In a grid collapse scenario, the difference it would make to have every house with even small stand-alone capability (just enough for a refrigerator, communication, some lighting, etc.) vs millions just in the dark, would be enormous. But here we are, just shoveling $$billions to the grid operators.
- lazide 3y agoThe utilities do have better lobbyists.
- miguelazo 3y agoTheir fat margins can easily afford them. And in a lot of cases, they can pass the cost along right to the ratepayers! There are some bills looking to outlaw the funding mechanism, at least. But a lot of these utilities are part of a larger holding shell company, so the laws will have to be creative.