2 ms·
This is true, but what's different in this case is that they seem to rely fully on their developer community to create the end-user value. The iPhone was a Bro
by rickdeckard 2y ago
This is true, but what's different in this case is that they seem to rely fully on their developer community to create the end-user value.
The iPhone was a Browser, a iPod, a Phone.
The iPad was a Browser and a Reading Device.
The Watch was a Wellness/Fitness companion.
The Vision Pro is TBD, depending on what the community will come up with...
The only thing that's clear and well-prepared this time is, that Apple gets a share of any revenue someone may create with it.
If there's one company that can keep putting money into this until someone comes up with value, it's Apple.
-
I believe Apple's end-game is, that every user is wearing this all-day and Apple becomes the master-profiler and gatekeeper to any type of consumption also in the real world.
But until they can execute on this direction they need to come up with a reason for someone to put this device on his head in first place...
- sanitycheck 2y agoIt's quite easy to get devs on board, all they need to do is add some new rules for App Store submissions. "All submitted apps targeting Apple TV devices must also fully support Apple Vision Pro by the end of Q1 2025" (Maybe only for apps with greater than X users in the previous Y months, initially.) We're all used to dealing with Apple by now, there would be some minor pushback and a bunch of reluctant AVP purchases by companies making VOD apps.