3 ms·
Nowadays I think most people (me included) would need to have "flong" explained to them - or to google it of course: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flong https:/
by rob74 3y ago
Nowadays I think most people (me included) would need to have "flong" explained to them - or to google it of course: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flong (funny that the Wikipedia article contains a reference to the Guardian hoax).
- pvaldes 3y agoWhat? Flong is not a word alluding to some dirt sexual practice? For Pica's sake, where is my old internet? This is inchcredibly dissapoint.
- mannykannot 3y ago"The San Serriffe hoax is ranked fifth in the top one hundred April Fool's Hoaxes by the Museum of Hoaxes." One should always be skeptical of an entity calling itself that, of course, but I look back rather wistfully to the days when #10 was an amusing hoax.
- WarOnPrivacy 3y ago> I look back rather wistfully to the days when #10 was an amusing hoax. Yes but #11 finally feels within our grasp. One-Door-Closes-and... ref: http://hoaxes.org/aprilfool/P10 http://hoaxes.org/aprilfool/P10