4 ms·
> That's a bold statement due to the way it heavily contrasts with reality. I'm ready to back this up. And no, I'm not confusing things - I work in HPC (realti
by kookamamie 3y ago
> That's a bold statement due to the way it heavily contrasts with reality.
I'm ready to back this up. And no, I'm not confusing things - I work in HPC (realtime computer vision) and in reality the only thing we'd use C++ for is "glue", i.e. binding implementations of the actual algorithms implemented in other languages together.
Implementations could be e.g. in CUDA, ISPC, neural-inference via TensorRT, etc.
- jpc0 3y ago"We use extreme vectorisation and can't do it in native C++ therefore the language is slow" You a junior or something? For 99% of use cases C++ autovectorisation does plenty and will outperform the same code written in higher level languages. You are literally in the 1% and conflating your use case for that of the general case...
- chipdart 3y agoI've worked in computer vision and real time image processing. We use C++ extensively in the field due to it's high performance. OpenCV is the tool of the trade. Both iOS and Android support C++ modules for performance reasons. But to add to all the nonsense,you claim otherwise. Frankly, your comments lack any credibility, which is confirmed by your lame appeal to authority.