> I am concerned that LLMs will discourage innovation in programming language design - why write a better Python if GPT can just automate the tedium away? I do

> I am concerned that LLMs will discourage innovation in programming language design - why write a better Python if GPT can just automate the tedium away? I don't think so negatively. My bet: innovation in programming language design will emerge that will make it a lot "less necessary/helpful" to use AIs. Just one example: Quite some programmers claim that AI take a lot of "tedium" from the programming away. But what if we could create programming languages that mostly get rid of this "tedium" (e.g. by using higher-level abstractions to abstract away the tedious, repetitive tasks)?