> causes its users to spend more than they otherwise would The promise of fame is not exceptional. The type of person who on an implicit promise makes decisio

> causes its users to spend more than they otherwise would The promise of fame is not exceptional. The type of person who on an implicit promise makes decisions that are damaging to their own lives possibly have a larger problem then the exact ownership specifics of one single media company. > Recessions may well have been triggered by less. What percentage of the working age population is actually using social media in this unhealthy way? Is there a better solution that doesn't involve outright taking decisions away from everyone else?