4 ms·
Then use a license that say your code can't be used to train AI models. Honestly I agree that in the current state of things, it's fair for them to train on pu
by thiht 3y ago
Then use a license that say your code can't be used to train AI models.
Honestly I agree that in the current state of things, it's fair for them to train on public data as long as the license doesn't forbid it. I learned to code this way, so it makes sense to allow AIs to do the same, for now. If it's a problem, just use another license.
- xigoi 3y agoAtmost all open source code has a licence requiring attribution. Where is the attribution?
- thiht 3y agoWhen you read some source code to learn how to do anything, do you attribute it? It’s the same thing, attribution doesn’t apply to training material. You want to explicitly forbid AI training, not require attribution.
- oblio 3y agoThe problem is that there are software evolutions not foreseen by older licenses. Cloud providers, AI. Relicensing can be non trivial. Choosing the right license is non trivial. Who can say for sure which license is good in this new age?
- thiht 3y agoOh easy, there’s not appropriate license yet. Some organizations need to step up and create a license that forbids AI training. But it will probably not happen because of "but is it libre open source" useless debates.