2 ms·
Unless the subpanel was directly investigating TikTok's user experience, I'm not really sure if their study is relevant here. It would be overly broad to dismis
by talldayo 3y ago
Unless the subpanel was directly investigating TikTok's user experience, I'm not really sure if their study is relevant here. It would be overly broad to dismiss the EU's qualified claims because another study suggested that screens can't be addictive.
- superkuh 3y agoIt would not be overly broad. In fact, it's the opposite. The EU Internal Market has no expertise or knowledge regarding psychology and neuroscience. It is operating purely off non-peer reviewed feelings from their expertise in social media and business regulation. This is like, say, taking advice from a FCC official on mental health. A business major talking about biology.
- carabiner 3y agoThe dsm justified lobotomies and incarceration for black men who wanted civil rights. I think it's safe to say it's a lagging metric.
- talldayo 3y ago> This is like, say, taking advice from a FCC official on mental health. This is more like if the FCC demanded a company provide a risk-assessment for a blatantly harmful feature, didn't receive it, and took remediating action against the offending business: https://techcrunch.com/2024/04/17/byedance-rfi-tiktok-lite/ https://techcrunch.com/2024/04/17/byedance-rfi-tiktok-lite/