4 ms·
The argument isn't about whether to disqualify someone for a job that involves driving if they have a DUI, at least to me. I mentioned the Australian system...
by tyingq 2y ago
The argument isn't about whether to disqualify someone for a job that involves driving if they have a DUI, at least to me.
I mentioned the Australian system...when the employer sends the candidate name/info and the complete job description, and a government agency replies yes/no. I assume they have some criteria for how long ago the offense was, etc. And that candidates generally know if they apply for a job that's not a good match, they will get a "no".
In the US system, even for a job where driving is not involved, the employer gets the full record and gets to decide what to do with that information with whatever arbitrary opinions they have.
- pc86 2y agoGood - they're the ones hiring, they're the ones taking on risk, it's their money they're spending. It should be up to them whether a particular criminal history is relevant to the job. Even if it's not relevant and they just don't want to work with someone with a particular criminal history, isn't that their right?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]