3 ms·
> Isn't that the fault of the businesses? People are paying what the business is charging. Are you faulting customers for not paying more than the business asks
by John23832 3y ago
> Isn't that the fault of the businesses? People are paying what the business is charging. Are you faulting customers for not paying more than the business asks for the service?
No, I am painting the reality of the situation in an effort to point out that the OP's attempt to "abuse by ratings" is misplaced.
Where we stand at this point is that the OP wants a service (food delivery), but is receiveing a market discount for that service (the current price of food delivery that does not reflect a living wage for the service provider), BUT the OP is upset by the mechanism through which the market provides them with the discount (double apping). So much so that they wish to abuse deliverers with bad ratings.
- JohnFen 3y agoThe OP mentioned reducing the rating due to late delivery. I don't think that can count as "abusing the delivery people". It's one of the things that as a customer I'd hope would be reflected in the ratings. But again, this sort of thing is a great example of how ratings don't actually help anybody. Gaming the rating just to be nice to the service providers makes the ratings worthless to the customers.