2 ms·
https://globalnews.ca/news/10356789/loblaw-grocery-receipt-scanners/ https://globalnews.ca/news/10356789/loblaw-grocery-receipt-s... It's not just not a strawm
by bluefirebrand 3y ago
https://globalnews.ca/news/10356789/loblaw-grocery-receipt-scanners/ https://globalnews.ca/news/10356789/loblaw-grocery-receipt-s...
It's not just not a strawman, it's already happening, even if it is illegal
- Terr_ 3y ago> it's already happening Your link doesn't say that though. Where does it supports the claim that suspect-customers were/will-be illegally detained? Do you have some other source? And I don't mean "it happened once or twice before the company got slammed with a massive lawsuit that made them substantially change the policy."
- bluefirebrand 3y ago> Where does it supports the claim that suspect-customers were/will-be illegally detained? Not sure what your understanding is, but imo if a person is physically blocked from leaving a store, then they are being detained. It doesn't matter if an employee is doing it or if it's a gate with a receipt scanner They can and have had employees standing at exits to check receipts in the past, but people are under no obligation to present a receipt in order to be allowed to leave so most people just walk right by Physically placing a barrier in the way to prevent that is detainment. Replacing the employee with a scanning machine doesn't somehow change that.