5 ms·
Speaking from experience, the argument is everything else but flawed. Because the reality is, new tech gets rolled out, and then there is the expectation that
by lynx23 2y ago
Speaking from experience, the argument is everything else but flawed. Because the reality is, new tech gets rolled out, and then there is the expectation that alternatives should be implemented for people with handicaps. However, that step either never happens, or comes to late.
- vaylian 2y agoThis is still not sound reasoning. Otherwise we would not allow ourselves to have bikes because there are people without legs. The actual problem is not that new technology empowers able-bodied people, but that the existence of that technology can create false expectations of what all people should be able to do with that technology. The option to do code reviews in a 3D environment does not automatically mean that older technologies can't be used for the same task. And it does not imply that blind people will get fired if 3D code reviews become popular.