I dont think it scores higher neccesarily, but it certainly has a more narrow distribution than humans. If the average of the training corpus is closer to the a

I dont think it scores higher neccesarily, but it certainly has a more narrow distribution than humans. If the average of the training corpus is closer to the average human than a given random human then it will generally produce more relatable content. If you have a look at the spread of ratings between gpt and human youll see quite heavy tails on human evaluations, while for gpt theyre very light. This is natural, we click with some and dislike others. Why? Because with some the direction our bias takes us from the mean mean we are quite alike and for others we are very distant and cannot relate to one another. Gpt relates to all equally (well/badly) so while i think gpt could be better than a randomly selected person, a carefully selected person would be hard to beat.