3 ms·
Bokeh and depth are entirely a product of the properties of the lens. Among the great things about m4/3 is the tiny sensor, and tiny distance between the lens a
by ryukoposting 3y ago
Bokeh and depth are entirely a product of the properties of the lens. Among the great things about m4/3 is the tiny sensor, and tiny distance between the lens and the sensor, which together facilitate a low barrier to entry for high-quality fast glass.
Sure, take APS-C and get rid of the mirror and you get the same effect, but you still have physically larger lenses, significantly higher costs, and a whole lot of pixels that are doing literally nothing unless you're regularly making large prints.
Your whole comment reads like "what are ya, POOR?"
- ricardobeat 3y agoThere are few MFT lenses providing great bokeh, they cost thousands of euros. I don’t understand how you could take my comment that way. MFT gear is not cheap at all. APS-C these days can be physically similar in size, and cheaper while having better image quality. Hence why I think there is little reason to choose four thirds.