4 ms·
Sanctions are an important component of our society, in the broadest sense. They are net good, not bad.
by kiitos 3y ago
Sanctions are an important component of our society, in the broadest sense. They are net good, not bad.
- spacebanana7 3y agoSanctions are effective tools at undermining the economic & industrial base of an adversary. They’re poor tools as substitutes for criminal penalties for local residents.
- kiitos 3y agoLess "adversary" as evaluated by a specific entity, more "bad actor" as evaluated by the collective. Which is the intent. Of course nobody issuing sanctions specifically intends them to be criminal penalties for local (target) residents, it's nonsensical anyway as the issuer(s) generally don't have any kind of criminal authority in the relevant jurisdictions.
- spacebanana7 3y agoSuffragettes, civil rights activists and Vietnam war protesters would’ve all been considered “bad actors” by their democratic governments at stages of their journey.
- kiitos 3y agoYeah, but we course-corrected on those mistakes. That's how civil society works. We (necessarily) delegate trust and authority to higher-order abstract entities (i.e. the state) and make sure we have ways to influence how they behave (i.e. elections).
- spacebanana7 3y agoEventually we course corrected, but illiberal government oppression of legitimate viewpoints delayed it. See the British government’s crackdowns on Trade Unions in the nineteenth century, for instance.
- logicchains 3y agoThey're only a net good if you think the government of the biggest economy is always morally right. Because only sanctions by the biggest economies have any impact. Most of the people in the world who aren't Americans view America's foreign policy as overwhelmingly a net negative, so for most of the world those sanctions are a net bad.
- BeFlatXIII 3y ago[ citation needed ]
- kiitos 3y ago(waves hands around generally) everything?