51 ms·
You're using a circular definition there - "only a conscious animal can do consciousness stuff". My "rebuke" wasn't intended as such - it was meant as a break-
by HarHarVeryFunny 3y ago
You're using a circular definition there - "only a conscious animal can do consciousness stuff".
My "rebuke" wasn't intended as such - it was meant as a break-down of the mechanisms involved, and basically defining what this relevant aspect of "consciousness" (self-observation, in the way I described it) means.
Note that consciousness wouldn't actually be needed for an animal to override instincts - you could still imagine an animal that had a cortex but no self-awareness. I tend to doubt they exist, but not inconceivable. There's a medical condition called "blind sight" were patients report being blind, but can still navigate a cluttered corridor of obstacles, or gaze track moving objects, without being aware of it (i.e. they can see, but are not consciously aware of being able to see).