It sounds like the author was burned by a private company that uses keywords and patterns to identify misinformation, instead of some nefarious government plot

It sounds like the author was burned by a private company that uses keywords and patterns to identify misinformation, instead of some nefarious government plot to spread its agenda. Occam's razor applied here, sounds like he's blowing a simple spat with an automated corporate robot out of proportion. Advice: present the facts without the conclusions. People are capable of drawing their own conclusions, and you don't attract the bots looking for conspiracy theories if you don't use their language.